CONTRIBUTORS
RECENT POSTS
- From the Fact Check Desk: Is Foreign Money Funding Attack Ads?
- Axelrod to US Chamber: What Are You Hiding That You Don’t Want the American People to See?
- VP Biden Blasts “Karl Rove and His Friends” for “Shady Sources” of Fundraising for Midterm Elections
- Obama Pitches For Overhaul Of "Woefully Inefficient" Transportation Infrastructure
- Book Hurled at President Obama, Streaker Detained at Philly Rally
- The Presidential Planner
- 'Waiting for Superman' Director and Students to Meet with President Obama Monday
- Obama Points Finger at GOP 'Pledge' Education Cuts
- Republicans Wield Jobs Report As Weapon on Campaign Trail
- The Mystery of “Obama’s” Brand Cigarettes
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Axelrod to US Chamber: What Are You Hiding That You Don’t Want the American People to See?
October 11, 2010 6:13 PM
We caught up with White House senior adviser David Axelrod today to chat about the current controversy about the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and whether any of its ads are being funded with foreign money.
TAPPER: So the chamber says no foreign money is paying for any of their political activities.
AXELROD: And I guess my answer to the Chamber is just disclose where your money is coming from and that will end all the questions. The fact is they are spending $75 million in this campaign and they will not disclose where one dime is coming from. And that's the problem with all of these organizations. We have tens of millions of special interest money coming into these campaigns and no record of where its coming from and that should be a concern to every voter in this country.
TAPPER: Their answer would be why should they disclose. No one's disclosing.
AXELROD: Right and they have a point there. We tried to pass a law in the Congress -- every Democrat in the Senate voted for it, every Republican in the Senate voted against it -- that said everyone has to disclose. That all these organizations would have to disclose where their money is coming from whether they are supporting Democratic candidates or Republican candidates. The Republicans blocked that bill and the question to them and their allies is: what are they hiding that they don’t want the American people to see?
TAPPER: But you're asking the Chamber to prove a negative. “Prove that you’re not doing such and such accusation.”
AXELROD: It’s not proving a negative, Jake, because all you have to do to clear up the questions is reveal who your donors are from. The question back to them is why don’t they want to reveal where their money is coming from? I think the answer is, I think if the American people knew where their money was coming from they’d be a lot less apt to listen to the advertising, to read the mail, to respond to the kind of negative campaigns that the Chamber and some of these other organizations are underwriting.
TAPPER: But there's a difference between the Chamber and some of these other organizations, right? The Chamber we know what it stands for , we know basically the money is coming from big business and corporations. These other groups I understand, they have names like “Americans For Prosperity” we don’t know what they stand for or who’s behind it. But the Chamber is different, isn’t it?
AXELROD: Well we certainly do know about the Chamber, that they have foreign affiliates and they do raise money for the organization that way. What we don’t know is where the millions of dollars $75 million, is coming from that they are using to fund these campaigns. And the question back to them keeps coming back from us and others is why not simply say? What is it that is so nefarious about the sources of their money that they won’t reveal it? And that’s true with all these organizations.
TAPPER: Democratic organizations too?
AXELROD: I would be for disclosure for everyone. The American people ought to know where millions and millions of dollars in our campaigns are coming from. Whether they are supporting Democrats or Republicans. Transparency is what we need in the political system. What we don’t need are special interests spending millions of dollars in these campaigns, to influence these campaign, never owning up to it, but having more muscle in the congress than they already have.
TAPPER: But haven't third parties like these helped Democrats in the past?
AXELROD: Yes, I’m not suggesting that only groups that support Republicans should disclose. It think everyone in this process should disclose. It’s an unhealthy thing when the insurance industry, when Wall Street, when oil companies can pour millions and millions of dollars into campaigns and never own up to it . And it would be true on the Democratic side as well, it’s not healthy for democracy, it’s not good for everyday people.
TAPPER: But this isn't really about the Chamber itself, this is really about the president's vision of a worst case scenario.
AXELROD: Well what this is about, when this is done we’re going to see hundreds of millions of dollars spent by organizations who don’t disclose the source of that money. And that means any interest group can write a million dollar check, a ten million dollar check, to try to defeat a candidate, in order to push their agenda in the Congress and no one will ever know exactly what their involvement was. And that is not just a threat to Democrats, that is a threat to democracy.
TAPPER: And that's what you guys are worried about here? Some group going to a member of Congress –
AXELROD: It is a insidious, dangerous thing when people can contribute huge sums of money to run negative ads in campaigns and never confess or allow to their participation. It opens the door to all kinds of chicanery. And when the next Congress meets if there are people who are standing there who are beneficiaries of their campaigns, you’ll know in whose interest they are going to act.
TAPPER: But what do you say to people who argue you are demonizing an organization for a charge that nobody knows if it's true or not?
AXELROD: Well I’m not demonizing the Chamber of Commerce. I’m simply suggesting to them that they disclose the source of the $75 million that they are spending in campaigns and put to rest, put to rest the questions that have been, that have been raised.
TAPPER: Isn't that like the whackjobs that tell the president he needs to show them his full long-form birth certificate so he can put to rest the questions that have been raised?
AXELROD: The president’s birth certificate has been available to people.
TAPPER: The long form?
AXELROD: Someone once in the course of this debate about whether we should have a law to force these organizations to disclose where they’re money is coming from in the campaigns, someone said, and I think they’re right – “the only people who want to keep things secret are folks who have something to hide.” If the Chamber doesn’t have anything to hide about these contributions, and I take them at their word that they don’t, then why not disclose? Why not let people see where their money is coming from?
-Jake Tapper
October 11, 2010 in 2010 Midterms, David Axelrod, Jake Tapper, President Obama | Permalink | Share | User Comments (81)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Why does Jake not press Axelrod to answer the question about the long form?? It should be pretty obvious that Axelrod dodged the question entirely.
Posted by: ksdb | Oct 12, 2010 3:21:50 AM
This is why ABC replaced Jake with CNN reject anti-Chritiane Amanpour on "This Week".
We can't have real journalists like Jake practicing real journalism in "the Age of Obama".
That David Axlefraud is such a sleazy greaseball too. He must leave a trail of toxic slime behind him wherver he goes.
Posted by: OxyCon | Oct 12, 2010 3:17:06 AM
Heck, no one remembers but obama during the election was pounding in over 600 million dollars in campaign contributions and setting records... there has been questions floating around for over 2 years now about where it all came from, and that a number of muslim nations funneled money into his campaign. I think if were going to question where campaign money is coming from, the most logical place to start scrutinizing is right at the TOP.
Posted by: Kess | Oct 12, 2010 3:08:23 AM
Obama uses American taxpayers money to finance Sharia "Zakat",which he has stated he "Supports". In turn Sharia financing fund the taliban. One eighth of all Zakat goes to Islamic militants.
That is TREASON:
http://www.yidwithlid.blogspot.com/search?q=AIG+sharia
Posted by: Robert Laity | Oct 12, 2010 2:54:44 AM
So when is MSNBC going to start to accuse ABC and Jake Tapper of being birthers?
lol
Posted by: Latin2 | Oct 12, 2010 2:48:38 AM
People who request information that they are legally entitled to are NOT
"Whackjobs". Obama,no matter where he was born,is NOT a "Natural-Born" American. His father was a Briton. That made Junior a Brit,at Birth. One is required to have TWO parents BOTH of whom are Americans and to be born in the USA to be President. This is a longstanding legal precept outlined in the "Law of Nations". Congress has the power to "Define and Punish...offenses against the Law of Nations" (see USConst.,Article 1,Sec.8):
http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/08/17/there-is-no-president-obama/
http://americangrandjury.org/public/
Posted by: Robert Laity | Oct 12, 2010 2:47:41 AM
Tapper should have pressed the birth certificate. He never answered the ?. This administration is nothing but sleez.
Posted by: illeram Nad | Oct 12, 2010 2:43:00 AM
Wow! Real Journalism by ABC....Congrats....unfortunately...rules do not apply to Dems
Posted by: Bruce | Oct 12, 2010 2:03:52 AM
Careful, Jake, you keep asking these sorts of probing real-journalist questions and making these Obama functionaries squirm and paint themselves in a corner, you'll not be invited to the next White House Press Appreciation Celebration.
Posted by: serr8d | Oct 12, 2010 1:45:57 AM
Ok Barry you want to see were the money is coming from?
Here's the deal.
You show me yours I'll show you mine.
"YOURS" would be your long form birth certificate and ALL of you school records plus transcripts and grades from grade school to present.
What?
Oh I forgot, you got in through affirmative action.
Posted by: voted against carter | Oct 12, 2010 1:38:02 AM
the Democrats refused to disclose!!!
---
Source?
Posted by: true blue | Oct 12, 2010 1:09:25 AM
In 2008, the Democrats refused to disclose!!! Obama received contributions totalling almost a billion dollars!
Maybe the "unidentifiable" donations explains all of Obama's bowing to foreign leaders.
This is the most corrupt administration in American history.
We need to replace the lying liberals and take our country back.
Posted by: WE NEED TO REPLACE THE LYING LIBERALS IN CONGRESS! | Oct 12, 2010 1:01:24 AM
Of course, this is only interesting because Moveon operates under the EXACT SAME rules as the Chamber.
---
Except they don't. Someone commented on this earlier, I think. See Posted by: Gen X | Oct 11, 2010 6:40:51 PM or go directly to Plum Line ('Scarborough retracts false claim about lefty groups' disclosure. Will Rove and other righties do same?') or Raw Story ('Scarborough retracts claim that MoveOn doesn’t disclose donors') or open secrets (under PACS, moveon contributors)
Get informed. You owe it to yourself.
Posted by: true blue | Oct 12, 2010 12:16:11 AM
Lots of right-wingers are saying the McCarthyism thing now.....so where did all the parrots hear it? Beck?
Posted by: Skip | Oct 12, 2010 12:00:33 AM
Kinda funny given they're the ones that have been in Red Scare mode since the general election.
But speaking of McCarthy-- sorta-- Kevin McCarthy, another GOP “Young Gun” (not the one who dresses up as a Nazi) and one of the "geniuses" behind the vacant Republican “Pledge to America” was pressed to name one-- just one-- program he’d cut from the federal budget to reduce spending. He couldn't. He dodged the question, and then came up with the embarrassing statement: “the line item would be across-the-board.”
Most Republicans have been unable to name any programs they would cut to reduce the deficit. They call themselves fiscal conservatives but they're just reactionaries.
Posted by: true blue | Oct 12, 2010 12:10:33 AM
Not a single word from the media - including you Jake - on all the money spent by Moveon.org in 2004 and 2008. Of course, this is only interesting because Moveon operates under the EXACT SAME rules as the Chamber. It's only become a "story" since Republicans started to win the money game - before that, no so much.
Posted by: Lincoln's Ghost | Oct 12, 2010 12:04:44 AM
Lots of right-wingers are saying the McCarthyism thing now.....so where did all the parrots hear it? Beck?
Posted by: Skip | Oct 12, 2010 12:00:33 AM
true blew wrote:"d most of the people on here are upset that an Obama aide and Obama think disclosure when it comes to campaign contributions is a good idea. "
.
oBama says... disclosure for thee, but not for me.
Posted by: gk | Oct 11, 2010 11:56:13 PM
Wow, the stench of desperation coming from obama's inner circle as the election draws near is overwhelming. If they will stoop to this sort of McCarthyism now, what on earth will they do to try to save their administration in the 2012 reelection bid? the mind boggles.
Posted by: moderate | Oct 11, 2010 11:53:59 PM
So, a rape case haunts Buck, Miller won't divulge any further any information to the press for the remainder of the campaign and wants to repeal the 17th amendment,one of Cantor's young bucks is associated with some creepy group that glorifies Nazi's, Christine O'Donnell is a science illiterate with fewer logic skills than a gnat and yet....
d most of the people on here are upset that an Obama aide and Obama think disclosure when it comes to campaign contributions is a good idea.
Unbelievable.
Something tells me we're not going to be going in the right direction in this country for a very long time if dems, young bright people, progressives, liberals, thinking independents don't get out there and vote.
If they win, everybody loses. They're that crazy.
Posted by: true blue | Oct 11, 2010 11:46:52 PM
"Mary said it wasn't debatable and that means it isn't debatable"
Your confidence in Mary always being right is touching in a way Noz, however as for myself I'm not ready to delegate parental authority to her just yet.
See after Kerry got swiftboated Democratic strategists decided to respond strongly and directly to any future right-wing propaganda and this is I'm sure what the attacks are that Mary is referring to. Republicans in office are content to allow the right-wing smear machine do their dirty work for them. In fact guys like Rush Limbaugh make a living doing precisely that.
Posted by: Skip | Oct 11, 2010 11:43:31 PM
Interesting how Jake asks about the "long form" birth certificate.
-------
Interesting is one word for it. Just another Halperin chasing Drudge.
Posted by: true blue | Oct 11, 2010 11:35:27 PM
Provide proof because I have plenty of Obama doing it.
Posted by: Mary | Oct 11, 2010 11:01:21 PM
Let's see it. Sounds like a bald-faced lie to me. Quote in context, date, source.
Posted by: true blue | Oct 11, 2010 11:34:25 PM
Interesting how Jake asks about the "long form" birth certificate. You've got to know he really doesn't believe Obama and neither does Newt. But neither of them wants to be labeled a "birther" so they dance around it by first calling people like me "whackjobs", or saying they personally believe he was born in Hawaii, "but",.......
The bottom line is the Democratic Party led by Pelosi and Reid scammed America by not researching Obama's past. They didn't research anything and everybody knows it.
Obama could easily have been born in Kenya as anybody can get a Hawaiian birth certificate.
Posted by: Joe | Oct 11, 2010 11:32:32 PM
This coming from a guy who is funded by NGO's and multinational organizations all around the world! To quote John Stossel: "Give Me a Break!"
Posted by: B.S. | Oct 11, 2010 11:26:15 PM
This moron is just trying to rabble rouse and create something, anything to try and stir up anything as the Dems head toward Niagra Falls in a small boat. The crowd lines the shore watching them go faster and faster in current, .....but alas they are past the power plant and it's too late to throw them a rope,....they're going to go over the Falls, and there is no stopping them.
Posted by: Joe | Oct 11, 2010 11:25:48 PM
"Officers in the military are refusing to obey orders because Obama has not shown his birth certificate"
How many? 2 or 3 unfortunates out of hundreds of thousands? I would call that insignificant. And don't try and make victims out of these fools, they were quite adequately warned that they don't have a legal leg to stand on.
Posted by: Skip | Oct 11, 2010 11:24:39 PM
Axelrod is a total bonehead who is being paid by Obama to shill for him. His paycheck is his loyalty. Utter nonsense on top of it, .....where is the disclosure of the campaign funds Obummer supposedly got off of the internet 1 or 2 dollars at a time,....yeah right. I seem to remember Obummer saying his credit card software "malfunctioned" so they couldn't trace it back to the source.
Posted by: Joe | Oct 11, 2010 11:23:24 PM
Posted by: Skip | Oct 11, 2010 10:47:05 PM
Skip, I don't know why you bring up such a lame argument that even a 5th grader wouldn't attempt. Mary said it wasn't debatable and that means it isn't debatable.
Obama has attacked more private citizens and organizations than any other President. File that under Truth.
Posted by: Noz | Oct 11, 2010 11:17:09 PM
How about, I'll show you mine, if you show me yours? The Chamber should make that deal with Obama. If he shows his long form, legal birth certificate, his school records and everything else that's been sealed, then they will reveal the donors.
That will shut them up.
Posted by: J | Oct 11, 2010 11:16:24 PM
For Axelrod, President Obama, and the Democrats in charge, it's "transparency for thee, but not for me". Yes, transparency would be nice...in fact, it's what these people ran on in 2008. But once elected, they didn't give a flip. All of the meetings on Stimulus and Health Care were done in secret with their 3rd party groups like Apollo Alliance, Unions, etc. So, please DON"T talk about transparency. The C of C is pro-business, so of course this administration hates them!
Posted by: MLM411 | Oct 11, 2010 11:14:10 PM
Posted by: Skip | Oct 11, 2010 10:47:05 PM
President Bush verbally accosted and mocked private citizens? Really? Provide proof because I have plenty of Obama doing it.
Posted by: Mary | Oct 11, 2010 11:01:21 PM
Axelrod makes sense in places. So, if Obama doesn't have anything to hide, why not show us the long form birth certificate? 57% of Americans are no longer convinced Obama was born in the US> We are already in a crisis of confidence. Officers in the military are refusing to obey orders because Obama has not shown his birth certificate. People are being court martialed. War heroes are having their careers ruined because Obama has not shown his birth certificate.
It is time to stop ridiculing the birthers and start demanding to see the long form birth certificate!
Posted by: RoninIrvine | Oct 11, 2010 10:48:37 PM
"First of all, no President in our lifetime has attacked private citizens and organizations more than Obama. That isn't even debatable"
You must be suffering from self-induced Bush era Amnesia. The Republicans attacked anyone and everyone who criticized the Iraq war and their fiscal policies as being unpatriotic.
Posted by: Skip | Oct 11, 2010 10:47:05 PM
Posted by: Skip | Oct 11, 2010 10:15:17 PM
First of all, no President in our lifetime has attacked private citizens and organizations more than Obama. That isn't even debatable.
The US Chamber of Commerce story is a phony issue. You've been duped. Again.
Eric Lichtblau reported in the New York Times that "there is little evidence that what the chamber does in collecting overseas dues is improper or even unusual. They do get money from foreign Chambers of Commerce but it’s a very small amount and entirely separate from the campaign spend. But look at this. If you look at the issue of foreign money, actually, U.S. subsidiaries of foreign companies are under campaign law allowed to operate political action committees and in the past year, in the past election cycle, they've given more than $12 million. So there is some, let's call it foreign-connected money, if not actually foreign money that’s involved in this campaign cycle."
And CNBC Washington correspondent Eamon Javers stated, "Well, we’ve got about 160 of these PACs. Interestingly here, President Obama might want to look up the statistics because they're favoring Democrats. More than $6 million has gone to Democrats and more than $5 million has gone to Republicans from those subsidiaries – subsidiaries of foreign companies. So clearly that group favoring the Democrats by a pretty healthy margin."
Oops! But there's more.
During his campaign, Obama collected $233 million of campaign contributions whose origin was never traced, though at least one analyst at the FEC suspected a significant portion came from foreign sources.
Posted by: Mary | Oct 11, 2010 10:33:51 PM
"They regularly use this rule to attack anyone who dares to express any dissent, including private citizens"
As a citizen of THIS country you can express all the dissent you want. Just don't finance it with foreign currency and tell us its a domestic effort.
Posted by: Skip | Oct 11, 2010 10:15:17 PM
Obama and Axelrod are once again using Saul Alinsky's Rule #13 (from Rules for Radicals): "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." They regularly use this rule to attack anyone who dares to express any dissent, including private citizens.
Posted by: Mary | Oct 11, 2010 10:01:19 PM
McCarthyism! I don't see anybody being personally persecuted here. But it says alot about how egregious Republican supporters admit these charges are.
Posted by: Skip | Oct 11, 2010 9:59:12 PM
What about all the US taxpayer money that went to Kenya to try to influence the vote over a constitutional change? And what about Barry himself, US senator going to Kenya to help his favorite candidates' campaign? So hypocritical.
Posted by: Elle | Oct 11, 2010 9:48:25 PM
Jake, you guys going to look into all those foreign debit card donations to Obama in the 08 elections that you refused to look into while you elected this fool. Perhaps you could look into them, now that you will have lots of time while this guy slowly melts like the wicked witch right before our eyes.
Posted by: mrbill | Oct 11, 2010 9:44:31 PM
Perhaps the Obama Apologists can explain the following:
Donations from Foreign-Connected Political Actions Committees for 2010 Election Cycle:
To Democrats: $6,517,903
To Republicans: $5,581,701
Source: Opensecrets.org
Where is this money coming from Democrats?
Those who live in glass houses...
Posted by: tjp612 | Oct 11, 2010 9:26:35 PM
The problem with this? Axelrod hates liberals. He's said so publicly. Given that, why would I listen to or care what he says? Answer: I don't.
Posted by: jan | Oct 11, 2010 9:18:05 PM
McCarthyism is alive and well in the era of Hopenchange.
Great questioning by Jake, the following exchange was especially precious:
TAPPER: Isn't that like the whackjobs that tell the president he needs to show them his full long-form birth certificate so he can put to rest the questions that have been raised?
AXELROD: The president’s birth certificate has been available to people.
TAPPER: The long form?
Excellent. No response from Axe...
Posted by: tjp612 | Oct 11, 2010 9:17:47 PM
I would love to see Barry's college transcripts...but like Billy Jeff's medical history, the leftist media will keep on ignoring it long enough as possible for it to be forgotten.
Funny how that happens.
I bet Barry was a horrible student, on par with the wondrous Al Gore.
Posted by: Rev. Dr. E. Buzz Miller | Oct 11, 2010 9:14:02 PM
He's like the young person with not much real experience who goes to work at a non-profit without realizing that it is profit that allows the non-profit to exist. He simply has no clue how things really work. Barry has never worked a day in his blessed life, what is so shocking about his attitudes...
Posted by: Rev. Dr. E. Buzz Miller | Oct 11, 2010 9:12:10 PM
Senator McCarthy would be proud.
Except he was going after actual communists, not bankers, investors, doctors, plumbers and all the rest of us bitter clingers.
Ya know what's interesting? Obama has never dissed lawyers. I guess it is because we all know lawyers are not greedy.
Posted by: West | Oct 11, 2010 9:00:00 PM
Way to go Jake, on the birth certificate question! I've been saying that for 18 hours... And I happen to believe Obama was born here. But fair, is definitely fair. Is there video?
Posted by: Liz | Oct 11, 2010 8:56:04 PM
Where is the money coming from? Why is that such a difficult question? Why is it such a suprise that people want to know where the money is coming from? Is the truth such an unreasonable thing to ask?
Posted by: ChuckWildman | Oct 11, 2010 8:43:59 PM
Obama took something like $400 million in donations from people and organizations that have not been identified to this day.
Even the New York Times is repulsed by this false smear.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | Oct 11, 2010 8:34:46 PM
I want to see the vid Jake. Do you have it?
Posted by: Menderman | Oct 11, 2010 8:33:19 PM
Nobody is REQUIRED to do anything just to shut David Axelrod up. Obama never reconciled all his anonymous donors.
Posted by: Dave | Oct 11, 2010 8:29:15 PM
Post a comment


